Engineering Firm: Possibility of Water Supply Being Contaminated By Radioactive/Toxic Waste Landfill is "Zero"
by J.C. Huntington
Dateline: Phoenix Arizona, Wednesday, October 11, 2000
Posted to PoisonedWells web site Wednesday, October 11, 2000
Updated Thursday, October 12, 2000

       At a public hearing today to consider expansion of SaddleBrooke by nearly 4,000 dwellings, representatives of Robson Communities distributed  a memorandum from the engineering firm of Dames & Moore claiming that there is a "zero" possibility that contaminants found in the SaddleBrooke water supply originated from a radioactive/toxic waste landfill that lies over the aquifer supplying SaddleBrooke with their drinking water.

       In 1999, Robson communities contracted the firm of Dames & Moore to produce a report assessing the threat of Page-Trowbridge to the local water supply. 

       A representative of Dames & Moore is on record as guaranteeing that "contaminants will never hit the Oracle drinking water". 

      The guarantee was made August 17th, several years after contaminants had already been detected in the Oracle and SaddleBrooke water supply, and three months after toluene had already been detected in water samples taken from the U of A the montioring wells at Page-Trowbridge.

      While U of A officials discounted the toluene detection as "an anomaly", they have yet to explain the origin of Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, detected in samples taken from the Page-Trowbridge monitoring wells August 23rd.

       Dames & Moore have not yet defined specifics of their guarantee.

       At the hearing today, James Polus, General Manager of the Robson-owned Lago del Oro Water Company, offered a possible explanation for the recent finding of ethybenzene in the SaddleBrooke water supply.  Polus conjectured that the ethybenzene detection could have been caused by a person handling the sample who "might have recently filled his vehicle with gas, not washed his hands, and contaminated the test bottle." 

       Another explanation offered by Polus is that the laboratory that analyzed the sample made an error of some sort.

       Polus did not offer possible explanations for the source of the dichloromethane detected in the Oracle water supply in 1997, the detection of Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate found in water samples from the Page-Trowbridge monitoring wells in August, nor did he attempt to explain the toluene detected at the Page-Trowbridge montitoring wells in May.

      The Dames & Moore memo did not offer any explanations for the source of the dichloromethane detected in the Oracle water supply in 1997, the detection of Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate found in water samples from the Page-Trowbridge monitoring wells in August, nor did the memo attempt to explain the toluene detected at the Page-Trowbridge montitoring wells in May.



Use The 'Back' Button On Your Browser
To Return To Previous Page

News & Information
Introduction
Radiation Symbol
email:mekazda@mindspring.com