September 8, 2001 Dennis
Cady
Planning
and Development Director, Pinal County
Dear
Mr. Cady:
Referencing
my letter to you of September 5, I have attached a few more questions for
you regarding your Pinal County Comprehensive Plan 2001~1011 draft.
Because
your draft Comprehensive Plan states that "the planning process is structured
to emphasize public involvement" and because the Comprehensive Plan is
critical to the future of Pinal County, I respectfully request that you
answer the attached questions in writing, so your answers can be published
for public review.
As
a Pinal taxpayer, I request your written answers be sent to me by September
15 so they may be published to allow Pinal residents to review them in
a timely fashion.
I
would also request that you make a copy of this letter available to each
of the members of the Area 4B Citizens Advisory Committee.
Sincerely,
J.C.
Huntington
cc:
Anne Graham-Bergin
Robert
Carter Olsen
Jimmy
B.Kerr
Sandie
Smith
Lionel
D. Ruiz
|
Questions:
Specifically, Title 11 Section 806 of the Arizona Revised Statutes requires that the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan include an "analysis of how the future growth projected in the county will be adequately served by the legally and physically available water supply or a plan to obtain additional necessary water supplies." Your draft plan does not contain any such analysis. In fact, your draft plan does not even have a section on water resources. Since this is a draft plan and because there is no section addressing the Water Resources Element of your plan, it is reasonable to conclude that your Pinal Planning & Development department does not yet have a draft of the Water Resources Element defining "how the future growth projected in the county will be adequately served by the legally and physically available water supply or a plan to obtain additional necessary water supplies." However, your draft plan does contain a land use map indicating that Pinal Planing and Development is proposing massive development in Area 4B by authorizing developments that will house over 117,000 people1.
As of this writing, the Pinal County web page that provides residents access to these questionnaires leads residents to believe that the county-provided questionnaires cover all of the information needed to make the Comprehensive Plan viable (emphasis supplied)2:
During your meeting to gather input for your Comprehensive Plan held at the Oracle Seniors Center July 18, 2001, Joe Bidwell3 asked you why the questionnaires available on the Pinal County web site failed to address the issue of a sufficient water supply. You told Bidwell that this omission was a "clerical error" and suggested that he make a note to the effect that the questionnaire did not cover water resources on his questionnaire and submit it to your department.
It appears as though you and your department are attempting to mislead residents into believing that they have the opportunity to input to all the elements of the plan, when you know that they do not. Please explain why you failed to correct the questionnaires to allow residents to input on your Water Resources Element of your Comprehensive Plan when you knew that the questionnaires were flawed at least 7 weeks ago. Please explain why you have
allowed the Pinal County web site to continue to falsely imply that residents
have the opportunity to offer input on "all of the information needed to
make this a viable plan," when you knew that the Water Resources Element
was missing from the questionnaires at least 7 weeks ago.
2: http://www.co.pinal.az.us/PlanDev/PDCP/CPInfo.html 3: Bidlwell lives on his property located very close to the proposed Willow Springs development and is a 17-year resident of the area. 4: The document information for the PDF form of the questionnaires available on the Pinal County web site, show that the last update was 6/27/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Willow
Springs
|
|
|
|
|
Sustainable Community/Town
|
||
SaddleBrooke
Ranch
|
|
|
|
|
Rural Community
|
||
SaddleBrooke
Unit 21
|
|
|
|
|
Rural Community
|
||
SaddleBrooke
Units 42-45
|
|
|
|
|
Rural Community
|
||
SaddleBrooke
Units 46-50
|
|
|
|
|
Rural Community
|
||
Eagle
Crest
|
|
|
|
|
Rural Community
|
||
Rancho
Coronado
|
|
|
|
|
Rural Community
|
||
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix C:Hardcopy
of the Pinal County questionnaires for the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan
The
following is a printed version of the PDF files accessible via the Pinal
County web site September 8, 2001.
The printed versions show that Pinal County has failed to allow Pinal residents to input to the Water Resources Element of the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan via the hardcopy questionnaires, even though the Pinal County web site that provides access to the questionnaires misleads residents into believing that that the questionnaires cover "all of the information needed to make this a viable Plan."
|
[4]Per
section 1.1 OVERVIEW of the draft Pinal County Comprehensive Plan,
state law places several requirements on the Pinal Comprehensive Plan:
Pinal
County is required by state law to prepare a comprehensive plan "to conserve
the natural resources of the county, to ensure efficient expenditure of
public funds, and to promote the health, safety, convenience, and general
welfare of the public." (A.R.S. § 11-806)
[6]The
"Application Package" is a package of publicly available information on
a rezoning proposal.On July
2, 2001, Joe Pyritz, Public Information Officer for Pinal County, told
residents that Pinal kept two application packages on the Anam rezoning.Pyritz
said the "packages" were kept in different buildings and had different
content.Details may be read
here: http://www.poisonedwells.com/news/2001_07_02/news_1.htm
[7]A
listing of some the apparent violations may be read here: http://www.poisonedwells.com/ZoningViolations/Violations_V2.htm
[10]Section
3.1
Historical Perspective, lists Apache Junction, Casa Grande, Florence,
Eloy, Coolidge, Kearny, Mammoth and Superior as the incorporated cities
of Pinal County.
[12]E.g.
"enhance a community's sense of place . . . expand the diversity, synergism,
and use of renewable resources in the operation and output of local economic
activities."
[16]E.g.
SaddleBrooke Ranch, Willow Springs, Eagle Crest, SaddleBrooke Unit 21,
SaddleBrooke Units 41-45, etc.
[17]More
meetings set to discuss county plan,
by Alan Levine, The Florence Reminder, August 29, 2001
[18]Helzer
founded Citizens for Growth and Development, funded by Anam Inc. and Robson
Communities, Inc., the developer of SaddleBrooke, and the proposed SaddleBrooke
Ranch.Helzer's husband, Elwin
Helzer, works for Pinal County.
[22]Toxin
may taint water near old Oracle landfill,
by Tony Davis, The Arizona Daily Star; December 25, 2000.
[26]The
projects in Area 4B included the SaddleBrooke Ranch project, the South
Village of Willow Springs Project, the SaddleBrooke Unit 21 project, the
SaddleBrooke Units 42-45 project, the SaddleBrooke Units 46-50 project,
the Eagle Crest project and the Rancho Coronado Project.
[27]Newly
constructed San Manuel Airport named 'Airport of the Year,' renamed SM
Ray Blair Airport, by staff, The San Manuel Miner; August 22,
2001.
|
Back
to News & Information
Back
to Introduction
email:mekazda@mindspring.com