Wood
Field lease chronology
By
AUBIN TYLER Valley Life Editor, Casa Grande Dispatch |
February
28, 2002
|
Click on any image for
a larger view. Some images are scans of faxes, hence the poor quality
|
|
Cover letter from OHS to
Pinal County indicating OHS had signed the lease, and were making the lease
payment..
|
|
Affidavit of Publication
of Legal Notice declaring Pinal Board of Supervisors promise to sign OHS
lease.
|
|
Board of Supervisors Jan.
16 Meeting Agenda ( see Consent Items on page 2). Adobe
Acrobat reader required.
|
|
Ruiz's letter to OHS announcing
he was reneging on the deal.
|
|
Letter from Pinal County
returning OHS check for publication of Legal Notice declaring Pinal Board
of Supervisors would honor the OHS lease. |
|
Letter from Pinal County
returning OHS check for lease payment |
In
his letter of Jan. 18, 2002, county supervisor Lionel Ruiz informed Oracle
Historical Society that he was giving the lease to another group, claiming
he had received no correspondence from OHS since February of 2000.
Indeed, there were no letters from OHS to Ruiz after that date. Yet
there was plenty of communication between OHS and the county regarding
the Wood Field Lease over the next two years. Former OHS Vice President
David Dobler said Ruiz himself had assured him in separate conversations
by phone and at the Oracle Oaks Festival in April of 2000 that the property
would be transferred to OHS and that Ruiz would talk to Pinal County manager
Stan Griffis and the county attorney to "get rolling."
But
Dobler heard nothing further and in September of 2000, he wrote to Griffis
inquiring about the status of the lease. A few weeks later, he received
a letter from Deputy County Attorney Glenn Johnson stating that the county
had assigned Johnson to draft the lease.
OHS
representatives met with Johnson in Florence on Oct. 13, 2000. Johnson
requested that three conditions be fulfilled: 1) determination of use;
2) appraisal of the property and 3) liability insurance.
These
requests were carried out between October of 2000 and April of 2001.
In April, OHS reviewed Johnson's draft lease. Between April and September,
Dobler continued negotiations with Johnson on specific lease conditions
requiring remedy.
"We
needed to fine-tune the language of the lease, because the county was asking
that the property be returned in better condition that it was received,
but nobody actually knew the condition of the property," explained Schiek.
Woodruff
had long had environmental concerns about the property since its bus yard
days. "When the school took the gasoline tanks out, it tested the
soil around the tanks, but nobody tested the grease pit where they poured
the used oil from the buses. Sometimes they poured it around the
fence line too, to keep down the seeds," she said. "My well is contaminated.
The oil breaks down but not the hydrocarbons or the heavy metals."
There
were also matters of property maintenance and safety to be worked out.
"We had asked the county to secure a small building on the property, the
grease pit and the fence, which was in a bad state of disrepair," said
Dobler.
According
to Dobler, Johnson agreed that the language of the lease needed further
work and that his office would make the needed adjustments. Betty
Harmon, who took over negotiations when Dobler stepped down from the OHS
board at the end of his term, received the revised lease from Johnson in
November.
The
OHS board approved the lease at its regular meeting in December.
It sent the signed lease and $25 lease fee to Johnson on December 18, 2001.
Concurrently, Pinal County published its Legal Notice of Intent to Enter
into Lease with OHS for four consecutive weeks in the Casa Grande Dispatch.
The
lease agreement was to be approved at the supervisors' Jan. 16, 2002 meeting,
but the item was suddenly removed from the agenda.
Two
days later OHS received a letter from Ruiz stating: "We assumed your organization
was no longer interested in acquiring the property," which left him "no
choice but to continue the process with (another) organization."
At
the end of January, the county sent OHS a bill for $84.29 for the four
weeks of advertising in the Dispatch. Two days later, a phone message
from the county requested OHS to disregard that bill.
|